Is Stop-and-Frisk Racial Profiling?

Or is it a necessary measure until the community offers a better solution?

On Tuesday, May 15, NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous, 1199 SEIU President George Gresham and Rev. Al Sharpton of the National Action Network  joined dozens of civil rights leaders, faith leaders, and elected officials in Foley Square to protest the NYPD's Stop and Frisk policy.

NYPD’s Stop and Frisk policy allows officials to stop and pat down any individual based on suspicion alone. Blacks and Latinos are nine times as likely as whites to be stopped, and the vast majority of those frisked are innocent. In 2011 alone, the NYPD stopped and questioned 685,000 people. Of those, 605,000 walked away with no charges.

However, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly fired back at elected officials who criticized the stop-and-frisk program and pushed them to offer another solution to curb gun violence:

“What have you said about how to stop this violence?” Kelly asked on Tuesday, reported the Daily News. No one offered an answer.

Kelly, normally cool and composed in public, appeared agitated as he sat at a table inside a City Council hearing room, the article reported.

Kelly also has stated publicly, during a previous visit to the 79th Precinct Community Council meeting his desire to see the community step up and take on a greater roll in helping to curb gun violence: “What have the leaders of these communities of color said? What is their tactic and strategy to get guns off the street?”

Maybe they did not have an answer, but they felt Stop and Frisk certainly was not the one, asserting that the NYPD's policy in its ineffectiveness amounted to nothing less than racial profiling.

At Tuesday's press conference, the leaders announced they would lead a “Silent March to End Stop and Frisk," to be held on Father’s Day, June 17. 

What do you think? Do you feel that Stop and Frisk policies are a necessary measure to curb gun violence in the city, or do you feel they do little more than racially profile innocent citizens and erode the public trust?

Take our poll, and let us know what you think in the comments.

pat May 16, 2012 at 04:22 PM
They should increase the stop and frisk and actually start going through vehicles. I am Hispanic, my people brought it upon themselves. Of course there are many good people of all cultural backgrounds, but a few bad apples, in this case many bad apples ruin it for the rest. Bed Stuy did not receive the bad rep because of all the Whites living there, common now. Enough with this rhetoric, why does the obvious still need to be pointed out.
KT May 16, 2012 at 06:24 PM
You must not be a patriotic citizen who is aware of their rights and civil liberties. First of all they're already going through vehicles. Without any warrants or even sufficient probable cause. "You ask why does the obvious still need to be pointed out?" You answered your own question - "Of course there are many good people of all cultural backgrounds, but a few bad apples," So that means the good people have to be treated like the few bad people. How is that right?
Isaias May 16, 2012 at 06:50 PM
Im from new york and hispanic. Stop and frisk needs to stop. Seriously ive being stoped and frisk more times I can count. Many times you have the polite officers then other times you have the ones that love your crouch multiple times and then the worst times are at night when you find the ones that like to grab you and toss you over fences, hit you with the but of the gun, insult you while you trying to be polite as possible.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »