patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Eviction Blockade for Longtime Bed-Stuy Resident Keeps City Marshals at Bay [VIDEO]

Thanks to a last-minute deal brokered by New York State Assemblywoman Annette Robinson, 82-year-old great grandmother Mary Ward may not need to leave just yet

 

It was a no-show this morning by New York City Marshals at the home of Bed-Stuy resident Ms. Mary Ward, a victim of a predatory lending scheme, as more than 100 residents and housing activists created a blockade around her home to prevent her eviction.

Thanks to a last-minute deal brokered by New York State Assemblywoman Annette Robinson, the 82-year-old great grandmother may not have to leave the home she’s lived in for the past 44 years—at least, not just yet.

In 1995, Ms. Ward took out a $80,000 loan against her one-family frame house after finding a flyer in her mailbox from Delta Funding.

Of the $10,000 she was promised in cash up-front, Ms. Ward would only see $1,400. She tried to rescind the loan the next day. But over the next ten years, the mortgage was bounced from bank to bank, ballooning to an astronomical $200,000.

Delta Funding is now defunct. Two years after Delta made the deal with Ms. Ward, the feds sued the lender for violating the civil rights of thousands of minority residents in Brooklyn and Queens by enticing them into loans they could not afford.

Still, Ms. Ward's, who is retired and lives on a social security check could not make the high payments. And so in 2008, a housing speculator, 768 Dean Inc., purchased the home in an auction.

Today, the speculators scheduled for marshals to finally take full ownership of the property. But an eviction blockade by residents and local housing advocates kept the Marshals at bay.

“We’re here today to make sure she stays in that house because that house is hers," said Kendall Jackson, a member with the community activist group Picture The Homeless, who attended the protest. "It doesn’t belong to the bank, it doesn’t belong to the speculators that bought it. It’s Ms. Ward’s house.”

Flanked by local press and protesters on her stoop, Ward made a brief appearance at the rally and addressed the crowd saying, "Don't let nobody walk on you. My grandfather was a slave, but I'm not a slave."

According to Edna Johnson, assistant to Congressman Edolphus Towns, the lawyer for 768 Dean Inc. and a marshal went into the police precinct the evening before the blockade, in an attempt to move up the eviction. "How do you like that?" said Johnson. "They tried to push the eviction up to yesterday, but the precinct refused."

“As of this time, there’s no Marshal that’ll be knocking on Ms. Ward’s door for a few days,” said Robinson.

Robinson, along with Johnson, lawyers for Ward and a representative from the 768 Dean Inc. met early this afternoon to try to agree on a deal that would allow Ms. Ward to stay in her home.

“We were able to get Mr. Chowdhury to get to agree to at least Monday at this point,” said Robinson. “Mr. Chowdhury is supposed to be back in contact with myself and a member of the staff of Congressman Towns and also the attorneys to let them know what decisions he’s made further.”

Assemblywoman Robinson said that she’s been aware of Ward’s plight since her days as a member of the New York City Council and said, she recalled telling Ward to take her case to the attorney general

“We offered Chowdhury some options, in terms of some escrow money I understand in the amount of $70,000,” said Robinson. “We said he could have and we offered him also the possibility of him donating that property to a non-profit organization so that he would be able to get a tax write-off so Ms. Ward would be able to stay in that building.

"We wanted to get him to be able to give her the deed back right away but that’s not going to happen today. But we’re hopeful that we’ll be able to resolve this extraordinary dilemma that is taking place. We believe that reasonable people will work out a reasonable resolution.”

For the most recent update on this story, visit: Bed-Stuy Great-Grandmother Still Praying for a Deal

Related Topics: 768 Dean Inc., Annette Robinson, Ed Towns, Marshals, Mary Ward, Predatory Lending, dispatches, eviction, and mortage

Patch_comments_icon

C. Zawadi Morris

3:14 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

The community came together, and the Marshals did not show up today to evict Ms. Ward!

Reply

Michael King

5:18 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

What a wonderful story! I know that things will work out for Ms. Ward because she has God on her side.

Reply

michael

5:55 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

While I feel sorry for her...Is the law the law/ ? Can we now choose what we want to obey and forget the ones we don't. The new owners bought the house totally legal and should be able to take possesion of it as they are entitled to by LAW

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nathan Stone

9:20 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

Buying a property according to the LAW at an auction does not absolutely mean you own it. An heir may pop up ten years from now with a valid claim against it. It's the risk the speculator takes even if he has bought title insurance. According to the story the woman was cheated. The buyer knows that. This buyer obviously was taking advantage of someone's misfortune. Only in New York.

Comment_arrow

Luwana

6:18 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

I'm thinking the same thing. I live around the corner from this lady. I saw these fliers up earlier this week and I felt so bad for her but after learning MORE about the situation....THE LAW IS THE LAW. She couldn't afford her payments from the beginning BEFORE she took the loan out. This is what happens when you can't pay...they take it back. PERIOD!!

Comment_arrow

Carol Andrews

10:21 am on Sunday, August 21, 2011

The law is not static, it is fluid and changeable according to circumstances, while the new owners may have went thru proper legal channels to purchase Ms. Wards' house it was based on illegal activities of previous banks.
If one was to unknowingly purchase stolen goods, should not the rightful owners have legal lawful claim to their items ??? Exactly - This is no different !!!

Comment_arrow

Janice

6:19 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

@ michael .. i agree with u.. this woman couldnt pay off her morgage.. a lot of ppl got their home taken away cuz they couldnt pay it off... my mom recently got one of her prpeties taken away but what can u do? nothing.. if u guys are gonna do this for one woman what about all the other ppl? and i dont believe the owner knew of the situation.. the house was bought by him 3 years bago.. and for three years he couldnt even get into the house cuz of her... the court sold it to him.. the court would have had to known about the preditary lenders before selling.. we respect the court because they go by the law.. listen to both side of the stories.. i will be damned if i bought a house.. then have it taken away from me.. get Mr. chowdury money back.. and im sure he will give her the house back.. fill in both of their shoes and see where u stand.. help them both!!

Comment_arrow

Brian Skinner

1:23 pm on Saturday, November 5, 2011

Did you note she tried to recind the loan the next day? I worked for a Predatory lender for 5 years and all of the brokers would "throw away" the recission requests which is ILLEGAL. On a refianance you hace 3 business days to recind the loan, that's Federal law.

michael

5:58 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

Dear Michael King...SHe has God on her side??? That is the dumbest excuse for someone not obeying the law I have ever heard. Oh....Ii get it....I can rob a bank...Ii had God on my side...No problem

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy Bouie

10:43 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

Ran
It's people like Michael who always talk about the Law and then use the Law just like these sub-lender's did to gouge out the eye's of this poor lady, fully aware of her vulnerability. But if it was your elderly mother or father that they took advantage of then you would be crying bloody murder, hang em' all. Is this what America has become? Rome in all its glory, so self rightous that we cannot see some else's pain.
All for that Dollar Bill, damn the innocent, they don't belong to my family,so it ain't my problem. Right, today it's them, tomorrow it may be someone you know, maybe Bernie Madoff will see you or someone you know.

Stephanie Keith

6:01 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

Check out more photos at my blog post. What an amazing day with Ms. Ward!
http://stephaniekeith.tumblr.com/

Reply

none

7:41 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

black people, and people of all races for that matter, have to come together like this MORE. this is the only way that officials, the police, politicians and corporations listen to us -- when people make a big stink and it makes its way to the news. God Bless everyone who came out to help Ms. Ward today

Reply

none

7:44 pm on Friday, August 19, 2011

we MUST fight back when we're wronged. the system was designed to make people just give up and go away. take a note from Ms. Ward - FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS

Reply
Comment_arrow

Luwana

6:23 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

HOW was she wronged? She couldn't PAY. She couldn't PAY her mortgage BEFORE she took the loan out. When you don't pay your rent or mortgage...you have to do. Lets say she never took the loan out. Lets say she just couldn't afford to make her mortgage payments years ago...should they just let her stay there because she's the original owner and a nice old grandma? Do you think you will stay if you can't give me my money?

Jacko Sikco

12:15 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

So she kept more than 70K that she borrowed against the house. Over 15 years, it has balloned up to 200K with interest which is reasonable. Now she doesn't want to pay the loan back or give up the house. What was so predatory? Ok, Delta took maybe 8k in fees up front. What are you "people" and "commnunity" rallying against? She needs to move out. She had more than 15 years to find out that the loan has not be "erased". Guilt-ridden Whities will rally for anything if it involves black folks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J.S.

1:12 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

She didn't keep the money... her lawyer spent it and is serving time for doing so.

Comment_arrow

Kendall Jackman

4:40 pm on Monday, August 22, 2011

Can you read? Nothing about this transaction was legal. The attorney general found Delta had targeted woman like Ms. Ward purposely. Can you say PREDATORY? The judge decided to proceed, EVEN THOUGH DELTA NO LONGER EXISTED ON A LOAN THAT WAS RESCINDED. Where in any of this do you see she couldn't wouldn't pay her mortgage? Because people are greedy, anyone, including a woman who has owned her home, with no problems, for 44 years should roll over and play dead so someone can flip it and make more money? Instead of attacking a GREAT-GRANDMOTHER who is trying to keep what's hers, attack the banks who got a bailout they didn't need, the justice system that is only justice for the connected, and the connected who are trying to erase the rest of us.

Jacko Sikco

12:19 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Dumbing liberals. "“We said he could have and we offered him also the possibility of him donating that property to a non-profit organization so that he would be able to get a tax write-off so Ms. Ward would be able to stay in that building."

Why don't you donate your house charity or have the old lady move in. Unreal!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Luwana

6:26 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

EXACTLY!! Ridiculous! I'm surprised those two idiots Barron & Sharpton wasn't out there...They are the BIGGEST instigators I have ever seen...this is right up their alley. I have three homes, two have tenants and one I am selling as we speak...If the tenant can't pay Guess what.... As the landlord, if I can't pay the bank...guess what....! This is what happens when YOU DON'T PAY! PERIOD!

Jacko Sikco

12:22 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Mr. Chowdry paid way more than $70K for that house even in foreclosure auction. So they want him to give up HIS house to some lady for what? Kick her to the curbs already.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J.S.

9:06 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Let's be clear, Mr. Chowdry didn't pay "way more than 70k" to buy the house, he paid way more than 70k to buy a loan that was against the house. Regardless of whether or not the money from that loan was spent - the loan at it's inception was illegal. 768 Dean is not entitled to profit from an illegal loan. When you're a real estate speculator who makes a living speculating in minority communities, one of the things you need to consider in your speculation is that the community might rally around a particularly unjust situation as they have here. I have no sympathy for these speculators. Absolutely none.

Luwana

6:26 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Yea...Just donate it...NP...lolol

Reply

pat

6:40 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

So did the elderly woman actually get 70k from the loan? If that is the case then the loan has to be paid. You make a deal with the devil, you give up your soul. In this sad case, it is the home. If the money was acquired, it must be paid back. I get it banks have very awful practices, but the bottom line is no one forced anyone here to take out the loan, other than personal circumstances. If this crowd wants to help this elder woman, they need to buy her an apartment, or pay her rent for the rest of her life. That probably won't happen thought. It's always easier to blame another person for our shortcomings in life. It is indeed a very sad story, but we can't let our emotions dictate how we make decisions based on reality. I wish this woman luck and hope this matter gets resolved. This is one more reason to get the criminals and soon to be criminals out of the projects and turn them into homes for the elderly.

Reply

J.S.

8:45 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

That said, the thing I don't understand about you guys who keep championing the law in this situation is - why are you skipping over the 3 or 4 examples of broken law that lead to it? This whole thing started with an illegal adoption Ms. Ward was trying to use legal means to fight. She went to Delta funding. Delta funding turned out to be a proven criminal enterprise. Swindled by this criminal enterprise, Ms. Ward went to a pro-bono lawyer who had taken an oath to uphold the "law" and protect people like her ... Ms. Ward was swindled again. This lawyer went to jail for her actions. Her loan then bounced around from company to company - probably being packaged in the hidden tranches of varying unregulated, legally gray Collaterized Debt Obligations at big banks that brought our country to brink of collapse and were rewarded with the biggest example of Amero-Corporate socialism the world has ever known. On the final end of this spectrum we have 768 Dean - obviously a "blood in the streets" type enterprise, looking to come up on someone elses misfortune. Can't knock the hustle I guess. How, you guys are so myopic as to single out Ms Ward as the most egregious villain is beyond me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

edward

5:50 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Fascinating and she should have gotten recourse before the house was foreclosed. NY has a court foreclosure process the subject of the loan should have been brought up then. The new owners bought the home at auctioned after the home was judicially foreclosed and are entitled to the property. We are a country of laws that's what makes our country great. I hope the woman is kicked out and order is restored.

Maisha Aza

9:19 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Thank you Jermaine!  It's also saddens me and angers me how many people this has happened to.  It makes me think of all the land black folks in this country used to have. Entire communities that white folks usurped and made their own, just because they wanted it.  Predatory lending is just a newer more sophisticated way of doing the same damn thing nationwide. We have to fight back and it's nice to see this community is helping her fight for what was rightfully hers in the first place. Thanks to all who participated and continue to help this woman and others like her across the country.

Reply

pat

9:27 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

I don't think these folks are painting the lady as a villain. I just think that most people are working really hard to hold on to what they have by paying their bills. If I don't hear from a company that I owe money to for more than two weeks past the normal time to pay, i call. I try and find out what is going on. Fifteen years is a long time to wait. I think the hope was that it would disappear and go away. It did not and now it is time to pay the loan back. The money had to come from somewhere. It sucks, yes, but this is still America and here we pay. If there is ill will then it should be investigated, but enough with playing the victim card. It is embarrassing to see those people in the street without them knowing the full spectrum of the story.

Reply
Comment_arrow

J.S.

9:53 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Pat, she's been in at out of foreclosure fighting this the entire time. She didn't just expect it to disappear.

"It sucks, yes, but this is still America and here we have to pay"

Are you serious? Respectfully ... what America do you live in? Who really had to pay for all of this? Banks got bailed out. AIG still exists. S&P is still a respected rating agency. Angelo Mozilo - the biggest crook of them all settled with the SEC for 67.5 million - but he's worth 600 million so he's still eating good. Very few of the other more egregious predatory lenders ended up in jail or broke. So you tell me who pays? Who really ends up paying for our collective greed? An old lady who was just trying to keep her great grandbaby? Is that justice? Is that how this America you speak of is supposed to work? Don't allow the ideals of this country to blind you to the harsh reality that those ideals are only executed consistently amongst the wealthier classes.

pat

10:50 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

I live in the America in which I still pay for my financial obligations on time and require no one to pay them fro me. Always have always will and you can bash this country all you want, but it has provided for me and my immigrant family with opportunities we never had before. Always easier to blame someone else.

Reply

Claudette Brady

11:03 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Delta Funding and other predatory lenders targeted elderly people (black, white, conservative, liberal). They offered illegal loans with inflated fees. The majority of the homeowners owned their houses free and clear and now many of them are homeless. The company's high pressure sales tactics and speed (24-48 hours) in which they executed the loans were totally designed to circumvent the law and stop the possible intervention of a younger relative who had a better understanding or the current lending laws. Read the Federal Trade Commission's case against Delta Funding
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2000/03/deltafunding.shtm

Across the country many towns have been devastated because of foreclosures resulting from predatory loans. some town have lost 80-90 percent of the population. The towns look like a smart bomb which only kills people had been detonated.

Reply

michael

11:46 am on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Hey Claudette.

Ever hear of a LAWYER..? thats what smart people get BEFORE they sign any document...duhhhhh

Reply
Comment_arrow

Claudette Brady

12:15 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

"thats what smart people get BEFORE they sign any document...duhhhhh" That's what informed people do. Senior citizens tend to be less informed about current laws and standards. Under NY State law an attorney is not required for a re-fi. In many states an attorney is not required for the purchase of a house. It is common practice in the country to prey on the elderly. How many new stories have we read about contractors, roofers, lenders, even relatives running scams on senior citizens in order to steal their money and their homes. We have seen elder abuse for economic gain affect everyone, from the rich and powerful like Brooke Astor to folks like Ms. Ward.

Comment_arrow

J.S.

1:04 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

@Michael - if I walk up to you and punch you in your face one day and then the next day tell you about how people are getting punched in the face, but that I'm willing to offer you protection... do you need protection or do I need to just stop punching people in the face? This is what the american legal system has done to the common man.

pat

12:06 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

The bottom line is no one and absolutely no one forced anyone to take out a loan, regardless of how tempting the offer. We can only hold responsible the person who placed their signature on that document. Let me tell you that there are many people that took loans against their home because of greed, not that this is one of those situations, but many were. I don't care to hear about the stories of banks being the bad guys. People went out and bought boats, cars, second homes and all other types on items. They were greedy, that is what caused our country to go through these hard times. You take money you have to pay it back, period. If it is not yours return it. I think fifteen years is plenty of time to figure something out, don't you. I am truly sorry this is happening to this lady, but that should not mean that i have to accept the circumstances behind it. How is this so hard to understand, it is not rocket science folks.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Claudette Brady

12:48 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

The circumstances of this story is that Delta Funding offered and illegal loan. Delta Funding's loan practices and documents violated Federal and State laws. The title company and Delta Funding ripped her off with inflated fees. Her lawyer who was suppose to the hold the proceeds of the loan in escrow spend the money and is now in jail. The Federal Trade Commission and every state in which Delta Funding did business prosecuted the company. With the securitization and selling of loans to none institutional buyers it can take 15 years to track who is holding the note. How many people really know who holds their mortgage. We the company servicing the mortgage, but who holds the note.

J.S.

12:55 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Pat you are seriously misinformed. The greed started on Wall St. I know because I was there, it's where I've made my career, working in Derivatives. Take a look at this clip - it's the most simple explanation for the collapse I've seen:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBbNVxnIm7w

"And what do I say, when they ask why it wasn't regulated?" - Michele Davis
"Tell them no one wanted it ... We were making too much money." - Hank Paulson

Reply

Marina Stanley

1:34 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Nice work Zawadi! Important discussion... personal responsibility vs. predatory lending techniques. I think like most things.. the answer lies with cleaning up both.

Reply

none

1:45 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Bump the negative comments in this thread, they are just mad that this woman is black and in their eyes "getting over." If somebodys white grandma was going through this Id want to protest and help her too. This woman worked hard all her life and didnt hurt anybody. Her only mistake was trusting too much. I am glad she is still in her house and dont care if anyone doesnt like it. Instead of laying back giving up and letting these dirty companies walk all over her like many do, she fought back and won.

Reply

michael

4:26 pm on Saturday, August 20, 2011

Hey JS If you punched me you would find yourself doing time...There are laws against battery. So cool it and talk right...Also who is this 'common man' you speak about? Where do you draw the line? at 75K per year? And if so if I make 75,001 am I not a common man anymore? Your arguement about the common man is misplaced and irrogrant. The only issue here is the Law. Whether we like it or not. As far as Delta...the law will deal with them in time thru the justice system

Reply

Monifa Bandele

8:02 pm on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Dear Michael and Luwana,

A little investigation would go a long way. Delta Funding, and the many predatory lenders like them, are crooks. http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/hce/documents/deltasettle.php

Reply

Janice

5:56 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

i dont understand.. why are u guys striking against one man? it should be fight against the predatory lenders and bankers.. too be honest< i dont think this movement is fair.. she fell behind her morgage and the man did what any other buyer would do.. if u guys are trying to help her than help him TOO.. he's a victim as well.. he bought the house and invested on it.. to just give it back to her would be like buying a diamond ring and then having it taken away because the past owner needs it.. what about all the money i put into buying that ring? how come i cant get my money back? if its justice u want< do justice for both? it obvious that house should not have been sold.. blame it on the court and the bank.. the whole world is cruel and MORALLY WRONG.. thats why its up to us the ppl to make a difference.. let help both of them.. let them give her house back AND the buyers money back.. it has to be an equal distribution.. sue.. the bank.. the lenders and the courT!!!! WE CANT HELP ONE AND LEAVE THE OTHER BEHIND..and help me too guys i need ur input.. have to write a darn essay on this topic.... I LOVE YOU AMERICA lol :D

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nathan Stone

6:20 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

If the buyer bought the property as a speculator then his loss is a risk that he knowingly took. No one will have any sympathy for him.
If the buyer bought the property as an investment property or future home then he should have title insurance and they should reimburse him if he does not gain full title to the property.

Janice

7:34 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

thts not the issue.. he bought the property and spent money on it.. if the house get taken away.. he should get his money back.. if u guys are breaking the for her than break it for him too.. it wont be right to take the house from him then give it to her and he gets nothing in return

Reply

pat

12:45 am on Monday, August 29, 2011

That will not happen, he will get the house. It is his now, by law. The only way he will not get that house, is if he agrees to some kind of buy out. Sad to see this happen to both parties. He is not a speculator because of the fact that he might not get the house, speculating is based on whether it will render a profit. That is typical Bed Stuy thinking.

Reply

Gary Lloyd

4:41 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011

Ms Ward needs to move out of that house. And as a black man I certainly feel for her, but her legal woes have zero to do with the legal status of that property NOW.

The auction was a legal transaction. Chowdary is now the legal owner of record and this may come as a surprise to many of you -- but he has rights too.

In fact, his right to access trumps her right of squatting.

And, Finally, let's be honest about the real narrative here: White yuppies from Levittown now making their homes in Bed-Stuy trying to take over Bed-Stuy from the back door.

I'm from Bed-Stuy. When the dust is cleared Ms. Ward will be the only black person left in the piece. They'll keep her as proof they're not trying to gobble up every other building in Bed-Stuy that's not nailed down.

And what's a woman her age doing in a whole house anyway -- that's a recipe for disaster right there.

If -- and it's a mighty big if -- she actually has $70,00, that's enough to pay her rent on a nice Section Eight senior apartment for the rest of her life with a little left over to get her hair dyed blue each week at the beauty saloon on the ground floor most of these senior apartments have.

Reply

deotha woodburn

9:07 am on Monday, September 5, 2011

to gary lloyd you need to be ashame of yourself. there is nothing legal about this. from the 1965 immigration and nationality act to the genocide in the negro/african american communities,ie bed-sty, harlem, east ny-brownsville etc. this genocide has destroyed the african american nationwide. you are so disrespectful,you can't be from this country. it's amazing how this so call (gentrification) has affected and devastated only the african /negro community in ny. not the itialians,not the ashkenazi european jews, they have taken over bed sty/williamsburg like crazy,working their way up bedford ave like crazy with hud federal funds. and what about the irish,and the latinos, let's not leave any ethic group out,even the all the ones who have contributed nothing to the existence to this country,but have been imported into this country to help themselves to the resources that legally belong to the negros in this country. you want to talk about legal. dr king is rolling over in his grave,tALKING ABOUT GIVING HIM A WALL IN WASINGTON,you got it twisted,dr. king did not fight for his people,suffered for his people,and died for his people for no wall in wash. he gave his life ,so that what is happening to his people today ie ms. ward,would not be. not for some immigrant from bangladash, or wherever. and you wonder why ny is having earthquakes,and hurricane,you think you people can continue to disrespect our elders,and his real chosen people negro/african americans,think again. dee w.

Reply

Kendall Jackman

5:42 pm on Monday, September 12, 2011

To Gary Lloyd, you are a bona fide JACKASS. If all these transactions were legal, why would the banks be trying to cut a deal with the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT where they will pay a $20 billion dollar fine, in exchange for not be PROSECUTED IN THE FUTURE. Does that sound like people who operated legally? And one more thing, the people involved with this issue (Couniclman Vann, Assemblywoman Robinson and Congressman Towns) after examinnig her paper trail realized that SHE STILL OWNS THE BUILDING.

Reply

norma Rowland

7:25 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

I'm sad to read all these negative comments if it was my Mom I'd be devastated. When you get older it's easy to get talked into things and if you do not believe that try getting old. I have been a speculator in foreclosed properties and there are often clouds on Titles, it goes with the teritory. This lady needs to get her property back and if the speculator is too mean spirited to do that with a tax incentive on the table then he is the vilain. Nobody is entitled to make a profit at the expense of others. I've done well all my life but not by taking andvantage of the elderly.

Reply

Rick

11:44 pm on Friday, November 4, 2011

we can all thank GWBush for his deregulation tactics to make his buddies richer and tank the U.S. economy i.e. ruin many peoples lives

Reply

John

7:44 am on Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Rick,

This was William Jefferson Clinton's fault.

Reply

Leave a comment