patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

As Special Education Class Sizes Increase, Community Members and Advocates Grow Worried

Community members, teachers and advocates express concern after changes to the Fair Student Funding formula allow for increased enrollment in special education classes.

 

The Panel on Education Policy recently agreed to a change in the Fair Student Funding formula that will increase New York City’s special education class sizes at the start of the 2011 school year.  This change will raise enrollment in elementary school inclusions classes from 10 to 12 students, and in high school self-contained classes from 12 to 15 students.

The projected changes have left some parents, teachers and community advocates worried.

“This is a disaster for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act  (IDEA),” said Patricia Connelly, Bed-Stuy resident and two-time member of the Citywide Council on Special Education.  Connelly, who is also the parent of a special needs student, adds, “[IDEA] is supposed to protect the rights of disabled students who are going woefully underfunded.”

Federal mandates for special education services are outlined in IDEA.  Students eligible for special education are given an Individualized Education Program (IEP), which is a legally mandated document that details their academic and social needs and provides guidelines for instruction.  Among these provisions are specifications for class size. 

To comply with these mandates, schools receive additional funding.  These funds are intended to cover costs for specialized instructional materials, paraprofessionals, related service providers and special education teachers. 

An increase in class size will lessen the need for additional special education teachers, but the Department of Education insists that this tightening of the purse-strings is necessary. 

“Basically, we were over-funding,” said sokeswoman Deidrea Miller, “We were using a kindergarten funding model which was a little over generous.”

Miller also said that changes to the funding formula are not out of compliance with federal mandates for special education services.  

“We’re still in compliance with the law and the teacher’s union,” said Miller. “In terms of what the kids’ IEPs say for class size, that will still be respected and fulfilled.” 

School districts throughout the city are all different, and so the impact of these changes may also vary.  Patricia Connelly warns, “In Bed-Stuy, the number of students in special education is higher than city-wide averages.  This will place additional burdens on schools with fewer resources.”  

Already, Bedford-Stuyvesant is not meeting state standards for performance in special education.  According to the New York State 2010 District Report Cards, District 13 and 16, both representing Bed-Stuy, did not make Annual Yearly Progress for students with disabilities in elementary school ELA and secondary school math and ELA. 

Another worry is that increasing class size will exacerbate challenges Bed-Stuy schools are already encountering. 

 “As an educator in Bed-Stuy, I've noticed that many of our children do not come from 'ideal' living situations,” says one special education teacher who wished to remain anonymous.  “Many students live in shelters, have family members in gangs, or barely have food or clothing.  School becomes a safe haven for them and some often don't want to leave.” 

While this is certainly not the circumstance for all schools and students, addressing these challenges could be more difficult with larger class sizes.  The same teacher added that, “An increase in class size will not allow students to get that individualized attention they need.”

Among dissenters of the formula change, individualized attention and instructional quality are a common concern. 

“Has anyone looked at what a decent class size is?” asks Leonie Haimson, Executive Director of the non-profit Class Size Matters.  Suggesting that current enrollment was already too big,  Haimson believes current models and programs should be evaluated before they are extended or revamped. 

Still, these changes may be just the beginning.  New York City is the biggest school district in the country, and therefore is often a trailblazer for educational policy. 

“Things that happen here will happen elsewhere,” said Connelly.  “If we say it is okay, it will start happening everywhere.”

Related Topics: Bed-Stuy schools, Fair Student Funding formula, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and special education services

Cynthia Eckert Wilder

10:32 pm on Thursday, June 9, 2011

I teach an elementary special day class in California. I'm happy if I only have 18 students enrolled in my class. I know I could do a LOT more with a smaller class size, but the changes described here don't seem that extreme.

Reply

Kathy Kinnick

10:28 am on Friday, June 10, 2011

I am also in California. Many of our high school classes have 25+ students. When we asked how we can justify that as being "small group instruction" we were told to stop using that term to parents.

Reply

Joan Ke

12:08 pm on Saturday, June 11, 2011

I am also in California. True many of our high school classes have 25 students. Just like Regular Education we no longer can get to all of our students. There are aides but not for all of our classes, which run from 8-3 daily.

Joan Ke

Reply

Rose

7:51 pm on Saturday, June 11, 2011

I was a 12:1 teacher in NYC. These changes are devastating because of the unique issues of the City. When I only had 6 students because the class was not filled to capacity, I was able to do amazing things because it was much easier to implement behavior modifications with such a small group. When the class filled to capacity with 12 students with emotional and behavioral disabilities, achievement dropped because it became about behavior monitoring and not academics. Anyone who has been at a birthday party with 6 kids as opposed to 12 kids knows what I am talking about.

Reply

Cynthia Eckert Wilder

8:29 pm on Saturday, June 11, 2011

I'm not saying that 12 is good; but it's a lot better than 18. And MUCH better than 25 (Bless you high school teachers!). All of us teaching in high-poverty urban areas with high levels of transience and high proportions of English Language Learners can complain about our "unique issues". None of us want to be babysitters. Funding should be equitable.

Reply

roberta

1:23 pm on Saturday, June 25, 2011

My first teaching assignment was at a NPS (non-public school). My class size was 7 with 3 class aides. We had students with aggressive behavior and other physical disabilities that required 1:1 aides. I currently work in a public HS. I started with 10 students and now have increased to 13. It has been difficult to work with the students to make sure that they are working on their IEP goals daily, as we have an array of physical needs and behavior issues. We all need to be aware of the rights of the students and the rights of us as teacher. However, in the economic troubles we are having, I guess we should be grateful for our teaching assignments. I am very interested to find the document that states the maximum number of students we can have on our case load. There are many different special edcuation models: RSP, SDC moderate to severe, mild to moderate, etc. I agree with Cynthia's comment, WE do not want to be babysitters!

Reply

Leave a comment